Why Greenhouse Operations Can’t Afford “Average IT”
- C J
- Apr 23
- 2 min read
By Corey Joinville
President & Chief Information Officer, AnchorPoint CIO Inc.

Greenhouses are one of the most overlooked industries when it comes to IT.
But they’re also one of the most dependent on it.
The Reality of Modern Greenhouse Operations
Today’s greenhouse environment relies on:
Climate control systems
Irrigation automation
Production tracking
Logistics and shipping systems
Remote access across multiple sites
When IT fails — operations don’t slow down.
They stop.
The Risk Most Operators Don’t See
Many greenhouse operations have:
Basic IT support
Minimal cybersecurity
No disaster recovery plan
Aging infrastructure holding everything together
It works… until it doesn’t.
What Downtime Actually Looks Like
When systems go down:
Environmental controls can’t be monitored properly
Orders can’t be processed
Staff are left guessing instead of operating
Production risk increases
This isn’t just IT.
It’s operational risk.
What “Good IT” Looks Like in Agriculture
It’s not about overcomplicating things.
It’s about reliability:
Stable, redundant network infrastructure
Secure remote access
Monitored systems and alerts
Backup and recovery that actually works
A plan for growth and expansion
The Difference Maker
The operations that run best don’t just have IT support.
They have:
clear direction and oversight
Final Thought
If your greenhouse depends on technology (and it does), then IT isn’t optional.
It’s part of your production environment.
📩 If you operate in agriculture or greenhouse production and want to reduce risk, let’s connect.
Written by Corey Joinville
President & Chief Information Officer, AnchorPoint CIO Inc.
Corey is a Fractional CIO helping businesses take control of IT, reduce cybersecurity risk, and align technology with real business outcomes. With experience leading multi-million-dollar IT environments across North America, he works directly with ownership and executive teams to bring structure, strategy, and accountability to technology.



Comments